am I rite or am I rite? (ayat mengundang penampar)

i never really realized it before,until recently,when i came across a forum discussing bout 'let's boycott maxis!' that it gave me a pang.

a pang of frustration.

i know, i know. this is again, isu basi.

but there is a 'but' there.

i never knew that there are these much of malay-muslims who hate non-muslim religious practices so much.

it's ridiculous.

they want to boycott maxis because the owner of maxis using the profit to construct temple, patung buddha and gereja.

first thing first. is that really TRUE?

where is the proof?

or is it just another rubbish of forwarded message?

if it is indeed the truth, what's wrong with that?

i dont get it.

they regard the construction of massive church and temple as some kind of 'attack' towards islam.

for me,it doesnt makes sense at all.

one of the readers said something like, 'pembinaan gereja boleh melahirkan lebih banyak orang islam yg murtad.'

really?

i think, not all, but most of muslims who convert to christianity made the decision merely based on their desire to escape from strict regulations in islam, merely to seek freedom that allow them to do whatever they like.

i dont really think that they would actually seek for the 'truth' from church, or going to church so that they would be preach by the priest there. nor they would be a 'good christian' after they had converted, go to church every sunday and all. i dont think so.

if they said that the church would encourage the christians in their effort to preach or 'memurtadkan' muslims, again i think it makes no sense at all. the 'dakyah' from christians has nothing to do with the construction of church. IT HAPPENS, regardless they have lots of church or no church at all.

come on. ananda krishnan got the money fair and square. he never force us to buy those maxis top-up, rite?he got the profit from his own effort. he can do whatever he likes with the money. who are we to stop him or say that his action is wrong and such?

after all, he is a buddhist (actually, i'm not so sure). so what's so wrong if he want to enlarge the 'patung buddha' at batu caves?what d'ya expect then? constructing more masjid kristal and taman tamadun islam?

in oversea especially, lots of interfaith dialogs had been held between christians and muslims, and most of the dialogs were held in church. when the time for prayer comes, muslims are allowed to perform the prayer inside the church itself.

it is not allowed for non-muslims to perform their religious practices inside masjid, and that is understandable enough. so we have to give them some space, so they could perform their prayer according to their religion in peace. if we hate the construction of church/temple so much, what do we expect then?forcing them to pray at home only?

because of this forum, i've been labeled as 'terlalu open-minded' and 'belum BENAR2 FAHAM ISLAM'. i was said as 'menyokong orang kafir.'

i'm speechless.

muslims always stressing on the importance of dakwah, but yet they hate those people that should be 'didakwah'. what's the meaning of dakwah to them? dakwah among muslims only?

i dont know.

agama tak pernah mengecewakan manusia, tapi manusia selalu mengecewakan agama.

dan manusia selalu mengecewakan manusia juga.

in the end...

am i rite or am i rite?

wallahualam